Web4 iun. 2000 · Here the plaintiff acted sooner. There are cases, illustrated by Lyngstad v Annabas Products Ltd, [1977] FSR 62, where, though the plaintiff acts promptly, the status quo favors the defendant. In that case Oliver J., decided for the defendant notwithstanding that the plaintiff acted promptly because the plaintiffs had no licence at all. This is ... WebLyngstad v Anabas Products Ltd - 1977 [1977] FSR 62. Case Treatments: 3 neutral 1 of 1 Sales Team: +44 (0)20 7284 8080 [email protected] Support: JustCite Help Knowledge …
Low Intensity Operations? - JSTOR
WebH.J.Heinz&Co.Ltd[1959]1WLR313(actor);Lyngstadv. Anabas Products Ltd [1977] FSR 62; Halliwell v. Panini (Unreported, High Court, Chancery Division, 6 June 1997) (pop groups); ELVISPRESLEYTradeMarks[1999] RPC 567 (estateofdeceasedsinger);Douglasv. Hello!Ltd[2001]2WLR992(actors). WebLyngstad v Anabas Products Ltd [1977] Anabas Ltd. produced, inter alia, badges and T-shirts bearing the name ABBA and photographs of the group. The second defendant, … pastorino claudia
Rihanna vs. Topshop: A Long-Awaited Success For The Celebrity …
Web张 倩，周 澎 （中南财经政法大学 知识产权学院，湖北 武汉 430073） 当前万物互联的社会结构和商业生态环境下，姓名权的内涵已非往日可循，姓名除却其本质的人身属性，在个人使用以及商业利用的共同推动下，亦凝结了个人努力的心血和凝聚商业投入的价值。 Web"However, I respectfully agree with the observations of Oliver J in the Abba case : Lyngstad & Others v. Anabas Products Ltd. ((1977) FSR 62 at p. 67). "I think, if I may so with respect, that the australian case to which I have referred is to some extent based on a misconception of what Wynn Pary J. was saying in McCulloch v. May (supra). Web15 mai 2016 · No. 15- IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. EDWARD J. O’BANNON, JR., et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE pastorini dan